On Obama’s Longer School Days: Quality Vs Quantity By Yetta Goodman
All the research that I’m aware of that relates to improvements in classrooms and better education for kids is supported by the notion that the most important element in that equation is the classroom teacher and the specific relationship between the teacher and the kids. Teachers who are committed, who are passionate, who are excited about teaching, who understand and are knowledgeable: these teachers do pretty well with kids, and they do well with ALL kids. The more knowledgeable the teacher, the more committed they are to kids—the more they care about kids and values the kids’ language and backgrounds: those teachers generally do much better with the kids than other teachers.
To me the big factor is teacher development, professional development, and teachers having opportunities and options to select materials that they think will fit their kids. So, to me this whole notion that you’re going to change test scores by lengthening school days or lengthening school days or years is off point . . .
First of all, there are lots of people who say (an I don’t know all the research in that area) that research doesn’t bear that out. It all depends on what you do during that time. We tell parents that it’s not the quantity of time you spend with your kids but the quality of time that matters and the same thing is true as teachers; it’s not the amount of time they spend it’s what they do with the time that they have.
How do they engage the kids in learning? How do they help their kids become excited about learning? An that’s the main focus of Saturday’s discussion here is what roles of teachers help support learners to develop their own motivation to engage in learning to get excited about it. That’s what we need in classrooms—we don’t just need more time.
Transcribed 10/18/09
Be the first to rate this post
- Currently 0/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5